Are women better rulers than men?

This argu workforcet on the question; are women better regulations than men? provide focus on the example of Elizabeth I compared to the medium of manlike rulers. It mostly depends which era you live in, in modern sheath times it would really not make much of a difference as both genders are considered equal. But in the Tudor era, looking at it from the present, a female would definitely rescue had the upper hand, but from the common perspective of earth in the Tudor times a female would overhear been considered lower, for a number of reasons, the main one being, female rulers were conjectural to have a husband to make the decisions for them, while the nance cat got on producing a male heir. Because it was lady-like in those times. The exposition for lady-like consequently was to be quiet, sit in a receding be submissive to males and not be able to do any(prenominal) thing for themselves. That really did challenge Elizabeth in the start as her parliament kept peste ring her toThere were a number of traits that Elizabeth too had that made her more successful than others. One of them was she was fluent in 6 languages; her native English, French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, and Latin. Later she came to terms with a vex of german.

They became very useful to her in foreign plolitical situations such as when shemade an bond certificate with France. The St Bartholomews Day Massacre, in which thousands of French Protestants (Huguenots) were killed, push the alliance but did not break it. Elizabeth even began trades union negotiations with Henry, Duke of Anjou , and later with his younger brother François, Duke of Anjou and! Alençon. Another was that she was a entirely ruler and upheld the law, when she wanted, she could be ruthless (such as... If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper