Jacques Derrida Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Jacques Derrida - Essay ExampleThe book wa tranlated in Englih and publihed in UA in the year 1970. (Gla, John , Leavey and Richard , 86-98)ection of the book and what they containThi i no ordinary writing. The common man would not be able to grap the import of the content of thi book. Even for the intellectual, it i a tough reading exercie. The firt half of the book contain the famed eay on Decarte and Foucault. It focue on the development of Derrida regularity of decontruction. Derrida carefully elucidate the traditional nature of ome nontraditional current of modern thought. The econd half contain Derrida intelligent analyi howing how and why metaphyical thinking mut exclude writing from it concept of language. Thee eay are on Artaud, Freud,Hegel, Bataille and Leve-trau-ort of Derrida rejoinder to their argument. Thi i the untranlatable formulation of a metaphyical concept which doe not exclude writing.We find Derrida at work on hi ytematic decontruction of Wetern metaphyic. The book firt half, which include the celebrated eay on Decarte and Foucault, how the development of Derrida method of decontruction. ... Hi new way of thinking, reading and writing are baed on the total undertanding of the old way, in their pure and unadulterated form. The chapter-wie content of the book are1. Force and ignification, 2. Cogito and the Hitory of Madne, 3. Edmond Jab and the Quetion of the Book,4. Violence and Metaphyic An Eay on the apprehension of Emmanuel Levina, 5. Genei and tructure and Phenomenology, 6. La parole ouffl, 7. Freud and the cene of Writing, 8. The Theater of Cruelty and the Cloure of Repreentation,9. From Retricted to General Economy A Hegelianim without Reerve 10. tructure, ign, and Play in the Dicoure of the Human cience, and 11. Ellipi.Jacque Derrida wa born to ephardic Jewih parent in Algeria in 1930. He did troops ervice in France. He began hi tudie in philoophy at the Ecole Normale uperieure in Pari in 1952. Derrida attended Harvard on cholarh ip in 1956-57.What the author i preenting in the bookDerrida advocate for the rejection of Wetern metaphyic tating and howing that written word did not tand for the poken word. poken word on the other hand did not tand for thought. Thought proce doe not tand for Truth or God. All thought proce end at the barrier called mind. The thought can not have both exitence beyond the mind-level. That i the domain of piritual experience, where thought have no role to play becaue at that level they are not there at all. (Gla, John , Leavey and Richard , 86-98)How it ha been utilized in the field of communicationDerrida contribution to the communication enterprie i mixed one -it i negative and poitive. A for the poitive ide, hi argument contribute to the awarene of mankind common apprehenion of being miundertood. No writer can